Hello! Truth be told I have no idea how you ended up here, but welcome. I only have the one blog, which means it gets filled up with a lot of unrelated things. There will be numerous fandoms, posts about privilege and oppression, and lots and lots of pretty pictures. Frequently school gets in the way and this Tumblr goes dormant, and then break comes along and I queue up a flood of posts, so don't follow if you like your dash to be somewhat regular. I'm working on plans for a hobbit hole mansion that me and my friends will live in. If you have ever thought about your own dream-home, then pretty please will you tell me about it? I don't put up pictures or much biographical information about myself, but you can call me Sakura Nicole. Oh, and even though this blog may not always be active, I will always answer my asks, so that's open if you ever need to talk to someone or rant. P.S. I do occasionally put up personal posts, usually under a read more. I would never ask anybody to not read something I put out there publicly, but if I know you in person could you at least pretend you didn't read it? Please and Thank You.

HUFFLEPUFF
{ wear }
Profile picture courtesy of Raya P.P.S. I am going to LeakyCon Portland and need friends! Please befriend me!

 

Islam starter kit for English speakers

pearlsfromthepath:

Because accessing reliable resources has become highly inconvenient, we tend to trivialise the importance we give to what we read, whether it be on the Internet or in books. For this reason, I have composed a list of crucial texts, that essentially addresses Muslims who live in the West. Although numerous PDF links are provided, I strongly recommend you purchase these books if you decide to use them in sha Allah.
  • Translations of the Quran

- The Quran, by M. A. Abdel Haleem [PDF]
- The Message of the Quran, by Muhammad Asad [PDF]

  • Collections of Hadith

- Al-Muwatta, collected by Imām Mālik [PDF
Sahīh al-Bukhārī, collected by Imām Bukhārī [PDF]
Sahīh Muslim, collected by Muslim Ibn al-Hajjāj [PDF]
Sunan Abu Dawud, collected by Abu Dawud [PDF]
Jāmi’ al-Tirmidhī, collected by Muhammad al-Tirmidhī [PDF
Sunan Ibn Mājah, collected by Ibn Mājah [PDF]
Hadith Qudsi, based on an-Nawawī’s work [PDF]

  • Exegesis of the Quran

The Message of the Quran, by Muhammad Asad [PDF
Tafsir ibn al-Kathir, by Ismaīl ibn al-Kathīr [PDF]
Tanwir al-Miqbas, by Ibn Abbas
Tafsir al-Qurtubī, by Imām al-Qurtubī  

  • Transliterations

The Quran: Transliteration in Roman Script, by Yusuf Ali Abdullah
The Quran: Transliteration in Roman Script, by M. Pickthall 

  • Quranic sciences
Dictionary of Quranic Usage, by M. A. Abdel Haleem
Understanding the Quran: themes and style, by M. A. Abdel Haleem
- Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran, by Imām As-Suyutī [PDF]
  • Islamic jurisprudence 

- Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, by Muhammad Hashim Kamali [PDF]
- The Clarified in Legal Theory, by Imām al-Ghazālī 
The Lawful and Prohibited in Islam, by Yusuf al-Qaradawi [PDF]
- The Four Imams, by Mohamed Abu Zahra

  • History of Islam

Islam: The Straight Path, by John Esposito
The Emergence of Islam, by Muhammad Hamidullah
- In the Footsteps of the Prophet, by Tariq Ramadan 
- Western Muslims and the Future of Islam, by Tariq Ramadan [PDF]
- Stories of the Prophets, by Ismaīl ibn al-Kathīr [PDF]

  • Philosophy

The Reconstruction of Islamic Thought, by Muhammad Iqbal [PDF]
Revival of Religious Sciences, by Imām al-Ghazālī [Vol. 1,2,3,4]
Sufism for Non-Sufis? Ibn Ata’ Allah’s Tâj al-‘Arûs, by Sherman Jackson
Disciplining the Soul and Breaking the Two Desires, by Imām al-Ghazālī

grrrl-riot:

androphilia:

Muslim Women Against FEMEN

The problem is that ever since 9/11 the western discourse on Islam and coverings has been shaped and dominated by what the Taliban was doing in Afghanistan. People think all Muslim women have been forced into wearing coverings when in fact many women choose to do it. If you want to wear a hijab or a niqab, that’s up to you. No woman in my immediate family has ever worn one and I have extended relatives whose children have chosen to wear it even though the mother doesn’t. Just because you don’t agree with something or understand something about another faith doesn’t mean it’s a horrible oppressive tool. As long as you aren’t hurting others, what’s the big fucking deal?

angryasiangirlsunited:

fuckyeahmarxismleninism:

Women around the world respond to FEMEN’s ‘International Topless Jihad Day.’

#MuslimahPride

Via Muslim Women Against FEMEN: “This group is primarily for Muslim women who want to expose FEMEN for the Islamophobes/Imperialists that they are. We have had enough of western feminists imposing their values on us. We are taking a stand to make our voices heard and reclaim our agency. Muslim women have had enough of this paternalistic and parasitic relationship with SOME western feminists. The group is open to all, Muslim and non-Muslim, men and women.”

FUCK FEMEN!

panasonicyouth:

stfufauxminists:

kidomega:

ssxvxtricky:

adornoble:

ludwigfeurbased:

maggotmaster:

Die.

Burn him at the stake

haha I hope anyone who takes Richard Dawkins remotely seriously unfollows me now because he is literally scum

people think this clown is someone to be admired and emulated

This is an absolute joke. You can’t even begin to sensibly list all the ways Muslims have excelled in these areas.
Al-Khawarizmi invented algebra. The word algorithm is derived from his name.
Muslims invented the symbol to express an unknown quantity (x).
An arab muslim wrote the first medical book on smallpox in the whole of recorded history. No one else had ever done any research on this topic.


fuck richard dawkins

panasonicyouth:

stfufauxminists:

kidomega:

ssxvxtricky:

adornoble:

ludwigfeurbased:

maggotmaster:

Die.

Burn him at the stake

haha I hope anyone who takes Richard Dawkins remotely seriously unfollows me now because he is literally scum

people think this clown is someone to be admired and emulated

This is an absolute joke. You can’t even begin to sensibly list all the ways Muslims have excelled in these areas.

Al-Khawarizmi invented algebra. The word algorithm is derived from his name.

Muslims invented the symbol to express an unknown quantity (x).

An arab muslim wrote the first medical book on smallpox in the whole of recorded history. No one else had ever done any research on this topic.

fuck richard dawkins

All aboard the collection bus

pbnpineapples:

aka14kgold:

this-is-not-jewish:

Today, one of my Jewish friends emailed me this chain letter:

I am truly perplexed that so many people are against a mosque being built at Ground Zero. I think it should be the goal of every American to be tolerant.

Thus, the Mosque should be allowed, in an effort to promote tolerance. That is why I also propose that two nightclubs be opened next door to the mosque, thereby promoting tolerance from within the mosque. We could call one of the clubs, “The Turban Cowboy”, which would be gay, and the other a topless bar called, “You Mecca Me Hot.”  Next door
should be a butcher shop that specializes in pork, and adjacent to that an open-pit barbecue pork restaurant, called “Iraq o’ Ribs.” Across the street there could be a lingerie store called “Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret,” with sexy mannequins with short burkas in the window modeling the goods.  Next door to the lingerie shop, a liquor
store called “Morehammered.”  All of this would encourage the Muslims to demonstrate the tolerance they demand of us, so the mosque problem would be solved.

If you agree with promoting tolerance, and you think this is a good plan, please pass it on, for the sake of tolerance.

This friend knows that I support Palestinian statehood. She knows I have read the entire Quran. She knows I run this blog. And yet she sent me this email anyway, in the apparent cynical confidence that despite my public views, as a Jew, I must secretly hate Muslims.

So I picked my jaw up off the floor, hit “reply all,” and typed this response:

Dear fellow recipients of this chain letter,

There’s a Jewish folktale that compares hateful words to feathers in a pillow—once you scatter them to the winds, there is no bringing them back. Given that the Islamic community center (which is neither a mosque, nor at Ground Zero) this chain letter alludes to opened in 2011, this chain letter has undoubtedly been making the rounds for years, and there is no possible way for me to find and address everyone who received it. I know that. But I can’t let this pass in silence, either, because silence implies agreement. Silence condones.

I don’t.

Read More

Kudos to you. This is awesome. I am so humbled and honored by everything you wrote. 

tomhiddlestonswife:

Apparently Laci Green quoted the Qur’an in her new video about period positivity. She uses the verse:

And they ask you about menstruation. Say: It is harm; therefore keep aloof from the women during the menstrual discharge and do not go near them until they have become clean; then when they have cleansed themselves, go in to them as Allah has commanded you; surely Allah loves those who turn much (to Him), and He loves those who purify themselves. 

2:222, Surat Al-Baqarah

Islam’s perspective is that menstruation is normal and it is natural, it is not considered as a “punishment” on women. There is nothing in Islam that says menstruating women are ‘dirty.’ Rather, menstruation is viewed as a natural process that normal, healthy women experience throughout their lifetime. Verse 2:222 of Surat Al-Baqarah is not implying women can’t “pray” when they’re menstruating; they can still ask things of God, make du’a, and read Qur’an. The MOTIONS of SALAH, which is entirely different, are not permitted, because in order to pray SALAH, you need wudhu, and blood invalidates wudhu. So bleeding from anywhere continuously invalidates it, even from a wound or a cut.

The part where it says “it is a harm” refers to how painful it can be, so avoid having sex with them because of that. Period cramps are absolutely horrible, I can’t imagine having to pray while experiencing it. Many women suffer from extreme cramps, heavy bleeding, nausea, headaches, and  other maladies during their cycle.  It is truly a sign of the Mercy of Allah (SWT) that we are excused from prayer during this time.The “pure” part of it refers to the ritual purification ghusl bath that must be taken after a woman has finished her monthly cycle. Muslims are expected to be in a state of cleanliness especially when going to pray.

If I missed anything or said anything wrong, kindly correct me or feel free to add.

(Source: faineemae)

spittingonhegel:

ismael-sarepta:

spittingonhegel:

Now you guys can stfu about “the west”

It’s the bias of the written — bias of what’s been preserved — that has perverted our understanding of the history of philosophy. However, the Middle-Eastern tradition (not all of who were Arabs or even Muslim) once revered the ancient Greeks as much as the West does. This fact has accounted for why, say, Greek manuscripts have survived (and the oldest extant that survive are only from the 9th-13th centuries A.D.), and why manuscripts of pre-Islamic Persia, or pre-monotheistic Mesopotamia that dealt with the same subjects have not.
Not to mention how much the ancient Greeks had as their basis the wisdom traditions, technology, engineering, astronomy, medicine, spirituality, and philosophy of ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, Persia, Phoenicians/Carthaginians, and the Scythians! — Oh but how the Western scholars warp their own research with these self-confirming biases, and pigeon-holes these “wisdom traditions” as unphilosophical because they are apparently too theological or spiritual? Or maybe because they’re too goddamn lazy to actually study what they’re talking about.
And yet, the Greek tradition itself is ubiquitous with, what? — Socrates, prophet of the Sun-God, anyone? Pythagoreans and their mathematical-mysticism Cult? Plato’s entire philosophy? Plotinus!? This Enlightenment rhetoric and its sycophants need to stop projecting their vision of some hyper-rational, atheistic, post-French Revolution, Western-European Academic understanding of street philosophy back to ancient Greece, and see it for what it obviously was — freethinking discourses that covered everything under the sun in unprecedented levels of diversity.
And, before you jump on the bandwagon of, “oh, Islamic philosophy was so this and that before the West”, don’t. All you’ll be doing is reinforcing a new pigeon-holing of what so-called “Islamic philosophy” was supposed to be — restricted and defined by a religion’s particular tradition. “Islamic” philosophy was hardly anything Islamic — Ibn al-Rawandi’s borderline atheism; al-Razi’s criticism of the prophetic tradition; al-Ma’arri’s harsh ridicule of divinely revealed truth. Not to mention the influence of the teachers of al-Farabi, ibn Sina, al-Khwarazmi and ibn al-Hazm, who were Christians, Buddhists, Jews, atheists, pagans, Zoroastrians, etc,etc. Call “Islamic philosophy” what it really was — philosophy that was done in the Medieval Middle-Eastern / Eastern Mediterranean.
It’s time to throw out these pigeon-holes like “Islamic”, “Western”, and “Middle-Eastern” philosophy — and look at the big picture of a great intellectual tradition that has been kindled within conditions unique to Afroeurasian Civilization — in particular, the Eastern Mediterranean to the Oxus-Jaxartes.These designations of “religious intellectual traditions” (“Islamic” philosophy, “Jewish” philosophy, “Christian philosophy”) are frivolous when you compare them to the rest of the world traditions. And the deep intellectual aspect of them all imitate each other. It’s literally like comparing Chrome, Opera, Firefox, Internet Explorer: every time one of them comes up with a new feature — say, tabbed browsing or (for religion) apophatic theology and Aniconism (Iconoclasts in the Protestant, Orthodox, Islamic, and Jewish traditions — why are we classifying them all so radically different?) — all of the other browsers (and religions) copy that, and make room for its features.
Why don’t we see these traditions for what they are in their organic, civilization-context? Why are we so caught up in the supreme arrogance of distinguishing ourselves from others with what is little more than words and symbols to designate our cool-kid-club from someone else’s cool-kid-club — when it’s actually just a small part of a greater intellectual tradition that has arisen under a narrow band of a certain threshold of Afroeurasian Civilization (*emphasis on Civilization, not so much Afroeurasia), which enables a diversity of permutations within that context of civilization?

^ THIS.
Everybody read this I’m on my phone and can’t type out a proper response so I’m just nodding a lot.

spittingonhegel:

ismael-sarepta:

spittingonhegel:

Now you guys can stfu about “the west”

It’s the bias of the written — bias of what’s been preserved — that has perverted our understanding of the history of philosophy. However, the Middle-Eastern tradition (not all of who were Arabs or even Muslim) once revered the ancient Greeks as much as the West does. This fact has accounted for why, say, Greek manuscripts have survived (and the oldest extant that survive are only from the 9th-13th centuries A.D.), and why manuscripts of pre-Islamic Persia, or pre-monotheistic Mesopotamia that dealt with the same subjects have not.

Not to mention how much the ancient Greeks had as their basis the wisdom traditions, technology, engineering, astronomy, medicine, spirituality, and philosophy of ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, Persia, Phoenicians/Carthaginians, and the Scythians! — Oh but how the Western scholars warp their own research with these self-confirming biases, and pigeon-holes these “wisdom traditions” as unphilosophical because they are apparently too theological or spiritual? Or maybe because they’re too goddamn lazy to actually study what they’re talking about.

And yet, the Greek tradition itself is ubiquitous with, what? — Socrates, prophet of the Sun-God, anyone? Pythagoreans and their mathematical-mysticism Cult? Plato’s entire philosophy? Plotinus!? This Enlightenment rhetoric and its sycophants need to stop projecting their vision of some hyper-rational, atheistic, post-French Revolution, Western-European Academic understanding of street philosophy back to ancient Greece, and see it for what it obviously was — freethinking discourses that covered everything under the sun in unprecedented levels of diversity.

And, before you jump on the bandwagon of, “oh, Islamic philosophy was so this and that before the West”, don’t. All you’ll be doing is reinforcing a new pigeon-holing of what so-called “Islamic philosophy” was supposed to be — restricted and defined by a religion’s particular tradition. “Islamic” philosophy was hardly anything Islamic — Ibn al-Rawandi’s borderline atheism; al-Razi’s criticism of the prophetic tradition; al-Ma’arri’s harsh ridicule of divinely revealed truth. Not to mention the influence of the teachers of al-Farabiibn Sina, al-Khwarazmi and ibn al-Hazm, who were Christians, Buddhists, Jews, atheists, pagans, Zoroastrians, etc,etc. Call “Islamic philosophy” what it really was — philosophy that was done in the Medieval Middle-Eastern / Eastern Mediterranean.

It’s time to throw out these pigeon-holes like “Islamic”, “Western”, and “Middle-Eastern” philosophy — and look at the big picture of a great intellectual tradition that has been kindled within conditions unique to Afroeurasian Civilization — in particular, the Eastern Mediterranean to the Oxus-Jaxartes.These designations of “religious intellectual traditions” (“Islamic” philosophy, “Jewish” philosophy, “Christian philosophy”) are frivolous when you compare them to the rest of the world traditions. And the deep intellectual aspect of them all imitate each other. It’s literally like comparing Chrome, Opera, Firefox, Internet Explorer: every time one of them comes up with a new feature — say, tabbed browsing or (for religion) apophatic theology and Aniconism (Iconoclasts in the Protestant, Orthodox, Islamic, and Jewish traditions — why are we classifying them all so radically different?) — all of the other browsers (and religions) copy that, and make room for its features.

Why don’t we see these traditions for what they are in their organic, civilization-context? Why are we so caught up in the supreme arrogance of distinguishing ourselves from others with what is little more than words and symbols to designate our cool-kid-club from someone else’s cool-kid-club — when it’s actually just a small part of a greater intellectual tradition that has arisen under a narrow band of a certain threshold of Afroeurasian Civilization (*emphasis on Civilization, not so much Afroeurasia), which enables a diversity of permutations within that context of civilization?

^ THIS.

Everybody read this I’m on my phone and can’t type out a proper response so I’m just nodding a lot.

My Comparative Spirituality Class (Formerly Comparative Religion, but Apparently that Word Carries too much Baggage)

I have so many problems with it. This will be a rant. Or a list. Probably both. But I’m leaning towards list.

For reference the six/seven religions we’re doing are:

  • Taoism/ Confucianism (don’t ask me why they’re grouped together. It has been a week and we haven’t learned anything)
  • Hinduism
  • Buddhism
  • Judaism
  • Christianity
  • Islam

(I chose Islam. It was interesting how most of the class flocked to the Eastern Religions.)

  1. The Mandalas: We have two weeks to make a “Mandala.” This is the big project of the course. We know absolutely nothing about the religion it belongs to. In fact, I don’t know which religion it belongs to (okay, Wikipedia says both Hinduism and Buddhism). It is supposed to be a design we can meditate on and not a form of personal expression. I don’t think my class understands that latter concept. Today we turned in sketches. I didn’t see many of them but I did see a mask, a wire tree, and a landscape cleverly made out of a Yin Yang sign. Gorgeous, all of them, but they don’t especially ring “Mandala” to me. Of course, as I said before I know absolutely nothing about them. I titled my draft “A Geometric Sketch that Could be Submitted as a Mandala” because I just don’t feel comfortable calling it a Mandala at all. And the only meditating on it I’ll be able to do is silently screaming “Cultural Appropriation!”
  2. The “Isearch” Paper - Interview: So, we each need to write an essay by the end of the course about our “journey” through it. An integral part of this paper is an interview with someone of the religion are group report is in. Preferably somebody we don’t know well. Also, the interview should be in person. Not even over Skype, let alone my preferred form of communication, text. This means that I am talking to someone (who I don’t know), solely because they are of a specific faith. Besides my social awkwardness and fears, which would make any interview hard, I don’t want to do this. I feel like I am objectifying someone. Putting them in a box to examine their personal beliefs. I try bringing this up and am met with “well, this is a good way to destroy any stereotypes or preconceived notions.” NOT MY POINT! I brought this up with a friend and she said “they should be glad people want to learn instead of listening to rumors and living in ignorance. I love this hands-on-approach our school has.” I just sort of stared at her, wringing whatever was in my hand (I think it was a water-bottle). This is the one time I really hate the hands-on-approach (although ask me again in the spring when I’m blacksmithing in the sweltering heat. I do not handle heat well).
  3. The “Isearch” Paper - Attend a Temple: I thought I misheard the teacher when he first said this. It is one thing when you are invited or are thinking about converting or far away from home and need a place to pray. It is quite another to just walk in to somebody’s place of worship to observe for a school assignment you are forced to do. My church isn’t a very sacred place to me (mostly because I feel like I’m in a nicely-furnished concrete box that is way to big for my personal comfort) but if somebody came up to my family plot in the graveyard to examine me and my family, I would not be comfortable at all. It hits all the buttons that screams “Disrespectful!” to me. This was part of the conversation that led to above friend saying that they should be glad. On a different personal note, I don’t believe I have any shirts that cover my arms. I guess a rain-jacket would be modest (although ugly).
  4. Group Project - Prayer: The teacher wants us to lead the class in prayer during our 45 minute presentation on a religion of choice. I have outright refused to do this, and if there’s one thing I will force the other three people in my group to comply with it will be not leading a mostly-atheist/agnostic-and-entirely-non-Muslim-class in a holy act of prayer. My mom suggested I find a traditional poem to use instead, after explaining how prayers usually go. The lovely Zilvia sent me a recitation of Surah Ikhlas that I can share with the class. But the fact that our group won’t be saying a prayer doesn’t make me feel better. There are five other groups who probably will, plus the countless classes before and after mine. And I just know that either the Buddhist group or the Hinduism group will be doing yoga.
  5. The Teacher (Turn back now if you don’t like negative criticism aimed at living human beings or you are my religion teacher): I didn’t like him before this class, but now I can’t even respect him. I don’t care if he is a genius, I just don’t respect him. A) Please stop using the word “myth” in this class. I don’t care if you are talking about Zeus or Gilgamesh or Jesus or Santa Claus (okay, maybe you can use it for Santa), just don’t say myth. Please. B) That cluster of smart-ass blond atheists who snicker the whole time? Don’t tell they are being childish calmly in the hopes that they will act their age. They won’t. Tell them that they are being disrespectful and rude. Separate them if need be. C) Stop comparing things to science. They are not the same at all. I know the Earth goes around the Sun because it is observable. I know God exists because I have faith. Both science and religion can coexist in one mind. Stop trying to make science a religion. D) Please stop the cultural appropriation. You are a middle-aged, middle-class, white, cissexual, heterosexual, American male who is also a pompous (sometimes ignorant) prick. I can’t make you stop doing Tai Chi on your own time. But I can complain about doing mandalas. Especially when we know nothing about them. And if you make us dress in “costume” I will give you no more of my attention except to complain loudly to anyone who will listen. You can’t stop me.
I have so many issues with this course. As far as I know, there are only three religious people in my class (including me). Another Christian and a Buddhist. Of the three of us, I am probably the least tolerant (and if I do say so myself, I am pretty dang accepting). It seems like a Comparative Religions class would be perfect for us. But as a whole the class is so intolerant towards religions. Be whatever sexuality you want, but if you’re anything but atheist or agnostic, you’re stupid. A *bleep*ing idiot. In freshman year a bloke I’ve known for years asked me why I was wearing a cross necklace. In sophomore year I was surprised to find that all three of the exchanges at that time were religious, and Christian at that. Not just my school but even where I live seems to lean toward the non-religious sides of things. And if you are religious, that’s cool unless you’re Christian. Then you are stupid/blind/ignorant/whatever. Of course, my interactions with the public reality are little, and these viewpoints may be very inaccurate due to my inexperience.

I guess I just want the class to be a little less personal. I don’t want my childhood friend going off on his philosophical rants (they are interesting, but rarely have anything to do with the subject at hand). I don’t want to be forced to take part in cultural appropriation. I want to actually learn about religions, and not spend a 45 minute period on a faux-pop-quiz that dissolves into off topic discussions in small groups.

A man is paid to teach me, and I want to learn, so what’s the problem here?

androphilia:

Mohammad Was Not a Womanizer, and Other Common Misconceptions About Islam Debunked | The Daily Beast

A virulently anti-Islam movie trailer sparked widespread protests across the Arab world and may have caused the death of a U.S. ambassador. But the truth about Islam is anything but hateful, writes Olga M. Davidson.

By Olga M. Davidson

September 13, 2012

1. Allah is not a name of a god. It is the Arabic word God, with a capital G, referring to the very same god that Christians and Jews worship. If you want to be very literal-minded it means “the god” because it is the definitive of the word “god” (ilah or ilāh), and if one adds the definitive article (al) it become Allah (Allāh, actually but let’s not quibble). In Farsi, God is called khodah—as in French, God is called Dieu, etc.

2. Mohammad isn’t a god. According to Islam, Mohammad is the final prophet, or messenger of God. He isn’t worshipped, since he isn’t God or an avatar of God. His example is emulated, but he is considered a real person, who eats, sleeps, loves, and so on. Islam has many prophets before Mohammad, including Abraham, Moses and Jesus and arguably Mary, because she spoke with God. Mohammad is just a man; progeny of human beings. In the Qur’ān it is clearly stated that God is neither begotten nor begets (lam yalid wa lam yūlad)

3. Speaking of Mary, mother of Jesus … she is considered to be among the finest of women and there is an entire surah, or chapter in the Qur’ān, entitled Maryam, the Arabic form of Mary. She is emulated because of her unwavering faith in God and her supreme spirituality. She becomes pregnant with Jesus, though a virgin, because God can do anything, but God is not considered to be the father.

4. Mohammad was not a womanizer. He married a widow, Khadijah, and was singularly devoted to her until she died. She left him with Fatima, their daughter. Upon her death, Mohammad did not want to remarry but was urged to do so by his followers. His subsequent marriages were primarily to form alliances with his nearest and dearest as well as with more remote followers. In the Sunni tradition, Aishah, daughter of Abu Bakr, was considered to be his favorite wife. She was married to him at a very early age and was consequently raised by him and was his only virgin bride. Her tender age was considered to be normal at the time, but marriages are not consummated until the bride has menstruated, just as in Game of Thrones. His other wives were either widows or divorcées. Mohammad wanted to form a tribe or ummah that was connected through faith, as opposed to blood ties. As this tribe grew, consolidating it through marriage ties was politically prudent. At the time, polygamy at was the norm in Arab tribal society and marrying widows and divorcées was a noble thing to do.

5. Women aren’t sold into marriage. Marriage and divorce in Islam have been greatly misunderstood. In Islam, marriage is a contract, not an oath. The groom has to give the bride a dowry to make the contract valid, and that dowry is for her and her alone to use as she wishes. Hence, her father or uncle or brother does not sell her. Unlike her Christian and Jewish sisters at the time, Muslim women could own property. As for divorce, it is not as simple as making a public declaration. Because marriage is a contract, dowry negotiations are taken very seriously; half the dowry is given at the marriage, while the second half has to be given if the bride asks for it or if the marriage is terminated through no fault of the bride. Furthermore, the groom needs to answer to the bride’s family of he wishes to terminate the contract. A bride can terminate the marriage if her husband is impotent or abusive; if he is an alcoholic or drug abuser; if he forces her to abandon her faith or act in a way that she deems as abandoning her faith; or if he disappears for over a year.  Marriage as contract, not an oath, is are meant to be fluid, and if a couple is not happy in living together, they can part from each other, remarry and continue to live normal lives.

6. Mohammad was not illiterate. The word Qur’ān means recitation, coming from the root q-r-, which means primarily to recite or declaim and then to read. If Mohammad is said to be illiterate, that is to underscore the importance of the spoken word, not the written word. The angel Gabriel gave the command form of q-r-, saying iqra’  , which means “recite!” in Arabic, when he transmitted the message of God as opposed to having something written on tablets. That is why memorizing the Qur’ān is so valued. Under Uthman, who was caliph from 644-656, the Qur’ān became a fixed text, as in it was written down as a finalized text and has not changed since. The style of the Qur’ān in Arabic is rhymed prose, so it is easier to memorize and is considered to be inimitable. The physical book as called a maṣḥaf (pronounced as maṣ-ḥaf), which means pages between two covers or a volume, but the value of those pages is in the recitation. When the Qur’ān became mass-produced, recitations of it were considered extremely reliable, to the great surprise of European editors.

7. You can’t be a Muslim if you don’t want to be. Contrary to the misnomer, “Islam or the Sword!”, the Qur’ān is quite clear about not forcing anyone to convert. Conversion must be done through the heart. It is simple because one just has to pronounce, with sincere intention, the shahida:  lā ilāh ilā allāh wa muhammad rasūlu’llāh ( “there is no god but God and Mohammad is his messenger”) three times in front of credible witnesses. Hence one comes to Islam from pure intention as opposed to being schooled by a priest, minister or rabbi.

8. You are unlikely to meet 72 virgins in heaven. The Qur’ān says nothing about 72 virgins waiting for you in heaven. Heaven is described, among other things, as the opposite of the harsh desert, hence it is verdant with the river or body of water, Kawthar, and filled with hūr al ayn, which means “ones with eyes that are very dark around the pupil”—a sign of true beauty. The concept of 72 virgins comes from outside of the Qur’ān.

9. Non-Muslims are not infidels. Christians and Jews—also Zoroastrians, for that matter—are considered to be ahl al kitāb or “people of the book,” because they are monotheists, and Islam is strictly monotheistic. References to infidels in the Qur’ān usually have to do with the Quraishi of Mecca, Mohammad’s own tribe, because they tried to kill him and destroy his following. Same would go for any Christian or Jewish tribe with the same intent.

Olga Merck Davidson earned her Ph.D. in 1983 from Princeton University in Near Eastern Studies. She is on the faculty of the Institute for the Study of Muslim Societies and Civilizations, Boston University, where she has served as Research Fellow since 2009. From 1992 to 1997, she was Chair of the Concentration in Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies at Brandeis University. Since 1999, she has been Chair of the Board, Ilex Foundation.

She is the author of two books: Poet and Hero in the Persian Book of Kings (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, 1994; 2nd ed. Mazda Press: Los Angeles, CA, 2006) and Comparative Literature and Classical Persian Poetry, Bibliotheca Iranica: Intellectual Traditions Series (Mazda Press: Los Angeles, CA, 2000), both of which have been translated into Persian and distributed in Iran.

Copyright © 2012 The Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC.

[Image: Indian Muslims offer Eid al-Fitr prayers at the Shahi Jama Masjid Mosque in the Walled City of Ahmedabad on August 20, 2012. (© Sam Panthaky, AFP/Getty Images)]

tariqbakobn:

ردًا على الفيلم المسيء لرسولنا الكريم علية افضل الصلاة والسلام
قامت جمعية (Discover Islam UK) في لندن
بتوزيع أكثر من 110.000 نسخة من القرآن المترجم،
 وسيرة النبي على المواطنين في لندن
 وهي ردة فعل ذكية وفقهم الله لنصرة الحبيب ودينه.

In response to the abusive film about the Holy Prophet Muhammad upon him blessings and peace,
“Discover Islam UK” in London
distributed more than 110,000 copies of a translation of the Qur’an
And the life of the Prophet Mohammed for the citizens of London.
Very smart response. May God bless them with the support of His beloved and religion.

mehreenkasana:

I’m with Shirin Sadeghi on this. This isn’t a conspiracy theory either. It’s just that all events in the anti-Islam film episode by “Sam Bacile” (who, reported by Israeli authorities, is not an Israeli citizen to begin with) seem to be contradicting. It also should be stated that the initially peaceful protest in Libya escalated quickly and absurdly which resulted in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens along with colleagues. This pathetic film was never heard of in Egypt and Libya before. It was barely attended in a Hollywood screening. In what seems to be a swift series of updates, USA has informed Libya of an arrival of drone strikes to “hunt Libyan attackers.” It’s also very interesting that Reuters says the Libyan gunmen attacked what was supposed to be a secret safe house where US diplomats were hiding in Benghazi.
Relevant to this: I’ve been asked about the Islamophobic film by followers on Twitter and Tumblr. You might want to read about the right-wing extremist who endorsed the film. I’ve seen the trailer and I can assure you of two things:
It is ridiculously childish. You’d except a man with a budget of $5 million to come up with something remotely interesting.
It is not worth any kind of rage or indignation.
Some people have too much time to waste. Let them rot on their own.

mehreenkasana:

I’m with Shirin Sadeghi on this. This isn’t a conspiracy theory either. It’s just that all events in the anti-Islam film episode by “Sam Bacile” (who, reported by Israeli authorities, is not an Israeli citizen to begin with) seem to be contradicting. It also should be stated that the initially peaceful protest in Libya escalated quickly and absurdly which resulted in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens along with colleagues. This pathetic film was never heard of in Egypt and Libya before. It was barely attended in a Hollywood screening. In what seems to be a swift series of updates, USA has informed Libya of an arrival of drone strikes to “hunt Libyan attackers.” It’s also very interesting that Reuters says the Libyan gunmen attacked what was supposed to be a secret safe house where US diplomats were hiding in Benghazi.

Relevant to this: I’ve been asked about the Islamophobic film by followers on Twitter and Tumblr. You might want to read about the right-wing extremist who endorsed the film. I’ve seen the trailer and I can assure you of two things:

  1. It is ridiculously childish. You’d except a man with a budget of $5 million to come up with something remotely interesting.
  2. It is not worth any kind of rage or indignation.

Some people have too much time to waste. Let them rot on their own.

youmightbeaconservative:

prochoicetruth:

Today in Benghazi- a pro-America demonstration in response to the attack on our embassy.

If you condemn Islam as a religion of violence and terrorism, you might be a conservative

(Source: choosechoice)

amillionexpectations:

Imam Dayiee Abdullah, one of the few openly gay Imams in the world. I hope I get the opportunity to meet this inspirational man one day. For more information about him, here’s an interview conducted by the 30mosques.com team (TW: comments section contains a lot of offensive material)

amillionexpectations:

Imam Dayiee Abdullah, one of the few openly gay Imams in the world. I hope I get the opportunity to meet this inspirational man one day. For more information about him, here’s an interview conducted by the 30mosques.com team (TW: comments section contains a lot of offensive material)