Hello! Truth be told I have no idea how you ended up here, but welcome. I only have the one blog, which means it gets filled up with a lot of unrelated things. There will be numerous fandoms, posts about privilege and oppression, and lots and lots of pretty pictures. Frequently school gets in the way and this Tumblr goes dormant, and then break comes along and I queue up a flood of posts, so don't follow if you like your dash to be somewhat regular. I'm working on plans for a hobbit hole mansion that me and my friends will live in. If you have ever thought about your own dream-home, then pretty please will you tell me about it? I don't put up pictures or much biographical information about myself, but you can call me Sakura Nicole. Oh, and even though this blog may not always be active, I will always answer my asks, so that's open if you ever need to talk to someone or rant. P.S. I do occasionally put up personal posts, usually under a read more. I would never ask anybody to not read something I put out there publicly, but if I know you in person could you at least pretend you didn't read it? Please and Thank You.

HUFFLEPUFF
{ wear }
Profile picture courtesy of Raya P.P.S. I am going to LeakyCon Portland and need friends! Please befriend me!

 

nihlisticalchemist:

fauvette:

native-detroiter:

ikenbot:

Star Trek: Into Whiteness

If there’s one thing that most fans of Star Trek will agree on, it’s the fact that Gene Roddenberry’s vision for the show — and, more optimistically, for human society — was predicated on the idea that all life is valuable, and that the worth of a person should not be judged by their appearance. Much of this was done through the old sci-fi trope of using aliens to stand in for oppressed groups, but Star Trek didn’t rely on the metaphor; it had characters who were part of the ensemble, important and beloved members of the Enterprise crew, who were people of colour. It had background characters who were people of colour. And, here and there, it had anti-heroes and villains who were people of colour … one of whom, Khan Noonian Singh, became well-nigh iconic.

Image 1: “Who is your favorite villain?” ; Actor John Cho (Lt Sulu) answers.

Image 2: TOS Khan looking at a watercolor of himself. Yes, he’s wearing a dastar (Sikh turban)

Image 3: Cumberbatch and Montalbán (as Khan)

And who is now being played by white actor Benedict Cumberbatch in the new JJ Abrams reboot movie, Star Trek: Into Darkness.

We’re all cynical and jaded enough to know the standard dismissal when it comes to matters of media representation: Paramount Pictures and most film studios are not interested in diversity or visibility, they only care about the bottom dollar. Star Trek as a franchise is too much of a juggernaut to affect with boycotts. There are too many people who love it, who love those characters and that world, and will go to see the movie. And for some of these people, this devotion to the idea of a future where even South and East Asian men get to pilot a starship and love swashbuckling, where Black women make Lieutenant on the Enterprise and actually get the boy, will be trivialized and eroded and whitewashed when the most formidable and complex Star Trek baddie becomes a white man named Khan.

It wasn’t perfect in the 60s when Ricardo Montalbán was cast to play Khan (a character explicitly described in the episode script of Space Seed as being Sikh, from the Northern regions of India). But considering all of the barriers to representation that Roddenberry faced from the television networks, having a brown-skinned man play a brown character was a hard-won victory. It’s disappointing and demoralizing that with the commercial power of Star Trek in his hands, JJ Abrams chose not to honour the original spirit of the show, or the symbolic heft of the Khan character, but to wield the whitewash brush for … what? The hopes that casting Benedict Cumberbatch would draw in a few more box office returns? It’s doubly disappointing when you consider that Abrams was a creator of the television show Lost, which had so many well-rounded and beloved characters of colour in it.

Add to this the secrecy prior to release around Cumberbatch’s role in the film, and what seems like a casting move that would typically be defended by cries of “best actor for the job, not racism” becomes something more cunning, more malicious. Yes, the obfuscation creates intrigue around and interest in the role, but it also prevents advocacy groups like Racebending.com from building campaigns to protest the whitewashing. This happened with the character of the Mandarin in Iron Man 3, as well as ‘Miranda Tate’ in The Dark Knight Rises, who ended up being Talia al Ghul but played by French actress Marion Cotillard. This practice is well in effect in Hollywood; and after the negative press that was generated by angry anti-oppression activists and fans when Paramount had The Last Airbender in the works, studios are wising up. They don’t want their racist practices to be called out, pointed at, and exposed before their movies are released — Airbender proved that these protests create enough bad feeling to affect their bottom line.

So the studio has now found a way to keep it secret and underhanded. Racebending.com was there for most of the production of The Last Airbender, and were even able to correspond with Paramount Pictures about it. This time, for Star Trek: Into Darkness, their hiding and opaque practices has managed to silence media watchdogs until the movie’s premiere.

As I said, this racist whitewashing of the character of Khan won’t affect how much money this Trek movie makes. And I’m happy that the franchise is popular, still popular enough to warrant not only a big-budget reboot with fantastic actors but also a sequel with that cast. I’m happy that actors I enjoy like Zoë Saldaña and John Cho are playing characters who mean so much to me, and that they, in respect for the groundbreaking contributions by Nichelle Nichols and George Takei in these roles, have paid homage to that past.

But all of that will be marred by having my own skin edited out, rendered worthless and silent and invisible when a South Asian man is portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch up on that screen. In the original Trek, Khan, with his brown skin, was an Übermensch, intellectually and physically perfect, possessed of such charisma and drive that despite his efforts to gain control of the Enterprise, Captain Kirk (and many of the other officers) felt admiration for him.

And that’s why the role has been taken away from actors of colour and given to a white man. Racebending.com has always pointed out that villains are generally played by people with darker skin, and that’s true … unless the villain is one with intelligence, depth, complexity. One who garners sympathy from the audience, or if not sympathy, then — as from Kirk — grudging admiration. What this new Trek movie tells us, what JJ Abrams is telling us, is that no brown-skinned man can accomplish all that. That only by having Khan played by a white actor can the audience engage with and feel for him, believe that he’s smart and capable and a match for our Enterprise crew.

What an enormous and horribly ironic step backwards. For Star Trek, for media representation, and for the vision of a future where we have transcended systemic, racist erasure.

(via RaceBending)

/a

A lot of fans are mad about this. Still, a lot of them didn’t “notice” Khan was brown. Hmm, white people.

See I’m not a hard core Star Trek fan, but I do love it. Now that I know that Roddenberry specifically said the character was from India, I’m a bit miffed. I’m sad this is still happening in movies.

Newly Declassified Memo Shows CIA Shaped Zero Dark Thirty's Narrative

wilwheaton:

Kathryn Bigelow’s Osama bin Laden revenge-porn flick Zero Dark Thirty was the biggest publicity coup for the CIA this century outside of the actual killing of Osama bin Laden. But the extent to which the CIA shaped the film has remained unclear. Now, a memo obtained by Gawker shows that the CIA actively, and apparently successfully, pressured Mark Boal to remove scenes that made them look bad from the Zero Dark Thirty script.

Well knock me over with a feather.

unprofessionally:

I’ve grown into a habit of staying to watch the credits and stay in theaters until the very end—when the projector is turned off. I was happy I stayed until the bitter end of Wreck It Ralph, and discovered a half-glitched Disney logo in the final seconds of the reel. I recognized it as the split-screen glitch from Pacman, a very genuine homage to the games the movie was modeled after.

Here’s some background on the glitch for those that don’t know, courtesy of Wikipedia:

Pac-Man was designed to have no ending – as long as the player keeps at least one life, he or she should be able to play the game indefinitely. However, a bug keeps this from happening: Normally, no more than seven fruit are displayed at the bottom of the screen at any given time. But when the internal level counter, which is stored in a single byte (8 bits), reaches 255, the subroutine that draws the fruit erroneously “rolls over” this number to zero, causing it to try to draw 256 fruit instead of the usual seven. This corrupts the bottom of the screen and the entire right half of the maze with seemingly random symbols, making it impossible to eat enough dots to beat the level. Because this effectively ends the game, this “split-screen” level is often referred to as the “kill screen”. Emulators and code analysis have revealed what would happen should this 255th level be cleared: The fruit and intermissions would restart at level 1 conditions, but the enemies would retain their higher speed and invulnerability to power pellets from the higher stages.

A very nice touch.

(Source: queenvowels)

handdrawnhero:

egkeller:

amazonpoodle:

we’ll eat you up, we love you so: Too many ladies!

delladilly:

it-goes-both-ways:

kisskicker:

“And the second reason was — during the years that I spent running Walt Disney Studios — I learned about how hard it was to find a fairy tale with a good strong male protagonist. You’ve got your Sleeping Beauties, your Cinderellas and your Alices. But a fairy tale with a male protagonist is very hard to come by. But with the origin story of the Wizard of Oz, here was a fairy tale story with a natural male protagonist. Which is why I knew that this was an idea for a movie that was genuinely worth pursuing.”

—Joe Roth, producer of Oz the Great and Powerful

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGH

What’s the problem?

The number of good strong male characters in Disney films is approximately zero. Why are you so pissed off that someone wants to change that?

i am replying to this not remotely because you have a strong or remotely factually founded argument (p.s. everyone check that blog out; it’s hilarious and tragic) but because we started a list of disney [animated because i don’t have all day] male protags on twitter that i think is worth sharing:

aladdin, tarzan, kuzco, pacha, hercules, simba, peter pan, quasimodo, both the fox & the hound, pinocchio, taran, mickey, dumbo, the tramp, wart, mowgli, winnie the pooh, oliver, that mouse detective, bambi, mr toad, pongo, milo, jim, kenai, lewis, bolt, wreck-it ralph

and then of female protags, i bolded those characters in whose film a male supporting character still saved/resolved the narrative climax— which, we can talk about themes and power dynamics until the cows come home AND WE SHOULD, but at the end of the day, it is not ariel who defeats ursula

snow white, cinderella, sleeping beauty, alice in wonderland, ariel, belle, pocahontas, mulan, tiana, rapunzel

which is still ignoring all the films made by pixar under disney (all but one about men), all those films about dudes that i don’t know or care what they are, and all those films (the rescuers, the aristocats) in which arguably there are simultaneously a male and female protagonist but the narrative is still, like, super sexist

against women

sexist against women

so for those of you keeping track at home, disney’s record for animated movies with narrative resolving male vs. female protagonists is about 27:4.

thanks.

this this this this this this this.

Also the idea that WE NEED MORE STRONG MALE PROTAGONISTS in our fiction actually makes me want to blow my brains out. 

Holy crow. I saw this earlier (without bolded commentary) and was pretty pissed to begin with. But seeing the protagonists’ lists compared is super sobering.

At first I didn’t quite believe there were so few solo female protags but then I realized all the bamf ladies I was thinking of didn’t fit the criteria that the male list above does.

Lilo? Male co-star. Meg? Not main protag. Merida? Pixar and if we add the Pixar men that top list will overwhelm me and make me cry.

Ugh. 

foradayofsky:

equalopportunityoggler:

howscandinavianofme:

theinnocenceleft:

disneyismyescape:

disneymoviesandfacts:

In their quest for authenticity, the Disney studios hired mostly Native American actors to do the voices. They also employed Native American consultants and had a session with a real shaman. Despite these efforts, prominent Native American activists issued an open letter condemning the film for its historical inaccuracies and stereotyping of the Indian people. However actor and Native American activist Russell Means (who performs the speaking role of Powhatan) has referred to the film, in particular the opening, as being the “single best representation of American Indians that Hollywood has ever done”.

This makes me happy. 

DEAR EVERYBODY.
DEAR. MOTHER. FUCKING. EVERY. BODY.

Definitely the other side of the “same token” from one of my more recent posts.

What bugs me so much is that YES, a lot of the Native American characters are actually fair representations. The only one that is really NOT is Pocahontas - who is so painfully ridiculously inaccurate purely for the sake of “we need a beautiful statuesque female character, dammit!” that it is absolutely FRUSTRATING to watch.
Also, as a side note: THERE ARE NO WATERFALLS IN FUCKING JAMESTOWN. I LIVED NEAR THERE AND JUST NO.

“However actor and Native American activist Russell Means (who performs the speaking role of Powhatan) has referred to the film, in particular the opening, as being the “single best representation of American Indians that Hollywood has ever done”.” Here’s the part y’all didn’t bother mentioning: “The Native Americans who worked on the film—such as Russell Means, the voice of Powhatan, and Irene Bedard—generally commended it. Means specifically called it “the single finest work ever done on American Indians by Hollywood” (Pocahontas 34). His comments especially drew fire from the Native American press, where a number of both columnists and readers who sent letters to the editor wondered if the former head of the American Indian Movement had “sold out to the white man and his money” (Rattler D1). Means’s pronouncements evidently became a source of controversy in a debate that highlights the competing conceptions of American “Indian-ness” that co-exist in contemporary America.”  (Source.)Those are the voices we should be listening to. The people who belong to Native American cultures. The people who have had to live with the results, not only of colonization, but of the continual portrayal of stereotypes. THOSE voices matter. Disney fans, I am sorry to inform you, really just…don’t. Not in this instance. This post is problematic for a number of reasons. Not the least of which is if you’re running around patting “Pocahontas” and Disney on the back for being the “single best representation of American Indians that Hollywood has ever done,” you’re not only ignoring some really fantastic films that are far, far more accurate and respectful of Native American cultures (and also made by Native Americans,) but you’re subtly buying into and perpetuating the myth of the “mystical magical Indian,” rather than seeing NAs as people. That’s a problem. (P.S. Russell Means also had this to say about “Pocahontas:” “And then there are times Hollywood got it right, Outlaw Josey Wales, Thunderheart (the only contemporary movie where there aren’t dysfunctional Indians, the documentary Incident at Oglala (very good based on historical fact) and Pocahontas: It’s the first time in history that they told the truth about the Europeans:  The reason they came over was to plunder, kill, and rape.  I know Walt Disney turned over in his grave once that was released.” Respect to Mr. Means for all the positive things he did for NAs, but he was, and remains even in death, a very very controversial figure among NAs, and I caution folks who are not NA against putting him up as some sort of standard bearer. That’s risky, at best.)(P.P.S. Watch “Reel Injun.” As soon as you possibly can.)

foradayofsky:

equalopportunityoggler:

howscandinavianofme:

theinnocenceleft:

disneyismyescape:

disneymoviesandfacts:

In their quest for authenticity, the Disney studios hired mostly Native American actors to do the voices. They also employed Native American consultants and had a session with a real shaman. Despite these efforts, prominent Native American activists issued an open letter condemning the film for its historical inaccuracies and stereotyping of the Indian people. However actor and Native American activist Russell Means (who performs the speaking role of Powhatan) has referred to the film, in particular the opening, as being the “single best representation of American Indians that Hollywood has ever done”.

This makes me happy. 

DEAR EVERYBODY.

DEAR. MOTHER. FUCKING. EVERY. BODY.

Definitely the other side of the “same token” from one of my more recent posts.

What bugs me so much is that YES, a lot of the Native American characters are actually fair representations. The only one that is really NOT is Pocahontas - who is so painfully ridiculously inaccurate purely for the sake of “we need a beautiful statuesque female character, dammit!” that it is absolutely FRUSTRATING to watch.

Also, as a side note: THERE ARE NO WATERFALLS IN FUCKING JAMESTOWN. I LIVED NEAR THERE AND JUST NO.

“However actor and Native American activist Russell Means (who performs the speaking role of Powhatan) has referred to the film, in particular the opening, as being the “single best representation of American Indians that Hollywood has ever done”.”

Here’s the part y’all didn’t bother mentioning: “The Native Americans who worked on the film—such as Russell Means, the voice of Powhatan, and Irene Bedard—generally commended it. Means specifically called it “the single finest work ever done on American Indians by Hollywood” (Pocahontas 34). His comments especially drew fire from the Native American press, where a number of both columnists and readers who sent letters to the editor wondered if the former head of the American Indian Movement had “sold out to the white man and his money” (Rattler D1). Means’s pronouncements evidently became a source of controversy in a debate that highlights the competing conceptions of American “Indian-ness” that co-exist in contemporary America.”
(Source.)

Those are the voices we should be listening to. The people who belong to Native American cultures. The people who have had to live with the results, not only of colonization, but of the continual portrayal of stereotypes. THOSE voices matter. Disney fans, I am sorry to inform you, really just…don’t. Not in this instance.

This post is problematic for a number of reasons. Not the least of which is if you’re running around patting “Pocahontas” and Disney on the back for being the “single best representation of American Indians that Hollywood has ever done,” you’re not only ignoring some really fantastic films that are far, far more accurate and respectful of Native American cultures (and also made by Native Americans,) but you’re subtly buying into and perpetuating the myth of the “mystical magical Indian,” rather than seeing NAs as people. That’s a problem.

(P.S. Russell Means also had this to say about “Pocahontas:” “And then there are times Hollywood got it right, Outlaw Josey WalesThunderheart (the only contemporary movie where there aren’t dysfunctional Indians, the documentary Incident at Oglala (very good based on historical fact) and Pocahontas: It’s the first time in history that they told the truth about the Europeans:  The reason they came over was to plunder, kill, and rape.  I know Walt Disney turned over in his grave once that was released.” Respect to Mr. Means for all the positive things he did for NAs, but he was, and remains even in death, a very very controversial figure among NAs, and I caution folks who are not NA against putting him up as some sort of standard bearer. That’s risky, at best.)

(P.P.S. Watch “Reel Injun.” As soon as you possibly can.)

Lilo, why are you all wet?

comicallycool:

videovriska:

daswiener:

captainhufflepuff:

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

This is actually heartbreaking when you remember Lilo tells Stitch her parents went for a drive, and the bad weather caused them to crash.

I always thought this scene was adorable

Wow thanks guy

Right in the childhood.

i never made that connection

image

Oh my god. That’s why it’s so important to her. Oh my god

this is tragic.

(Source: w-bunny)

wolfstar-thunderfrost:

elphabaforpresidentofgallifrey:

nerdfighter13812:

itsxandy:

disneymoviesandfacts:

According to the animators for Flynn, he’s meant to be 26 years old, thus making him 8 years older than Rapunzel, who is 18 in the film - the largest age gap between any other Disney couple.


Kida’s 8,800-ish with Milo’s 32, that’s… an 8,768 year age gap?

Can we just appreciate that Milo’s reaction is basically how tumblr girls feel about the men they stalk?

i mean it’s understandable



Also Disney wants you to pretend that Atlantis: the lost empire doesn’t exist (even though it’s actually really awesome.)

wolfstar-thunderfrost:

elphabaforpresidentofgallifrey:

nerdfighter13812:

itsxandy:

disneymoviesandfacts:

According to the animators for Flynn, he’s meant to be 26 years old, thus making him 8 years older than Rapunzel, who is 18 in the film - the largest age gap between any other Disney couple.

image

Kida’s 8,800-ish with Milo’s 32, that’s… an 8,768 year age gap?

Can we just appreciate that Milo’s reaction is basically how tumblr girls feel about the men they stalk?

i mean it’s understandable

Also Disney wants you to pretend that Atlantis: the lost empire doesn’t exist (even though it’s actually really awesome.)

wingedbookworm:

elletromil:

somanykilifeels:

captainamerica-in-middle-earth:

If you ever feel bad for procrastinating, just remember that Peter Jackson was still editing The Return of the King a few hours before it was supposed to premier. 

Same with The Hobbit

I have found my god

this makes me feel better about myself.

joli-joly:

mustardwketchup:

mydollyaviana:

A crash course on non-disney films and studios (sequels not included; list is not exhaustive)

UGH SO MUCH CHILDHOOD.

SWAN PRINCESS. BALTO. QUEST FOR CAMELOT. AHHHHHHHHH……!

BALTO. BALTOBALTOBALTO. BALTO.

Anastasia was my fave.