Hello! Truth be told I have no idea how you ended up here, but welcome. I only have the one blog, which means it gets filled up with a lot of unrelated things. There will be numerous fandoms, posts about privilege and oppression, and lots and lots of pretty pictures. Frequently school gets in the way and this Tumblr goes dormant, and then break comes along and I queue up a flood of posts, so don't follow if you like your dash to be somewhat regular. I'm working on plans for a hobbit hole mansion that me and my friends will live in. If you have ever thought about your own dream-home, then pretty please will you tell me about it? I don't put up pictures or much biographical information about myself, but you can call me Sakura Nicole. Oh, and even though this blog may not always be active, I will always answer my asks, so that's open if you ever need to talk to someone or rant. P.S. I do occasionally put up personal posts, usually under a read more. I would never ask anybody to not read something I put out there publicly, but if I know you in person could you at least pretend you didn't read it? Please and Thank You.

HUFFLEPUFF
{ wear }
Profile picture courtesy of Raya P.P.S. I am going to LeakyCon Portland and need friends! Please befriend me!

 

durnesque-esque:

joyfully-chaotic:

thatcrazywhoviangirl:

miss-nerdgasmz:

yuseimonarch:

nullvoid0:

gossiptroll:

my idea of a hot date 

Hell yes

I had no idea there were women like this how do I find them?

I mean shit bro are we really that rare

There are women like us out there. I would do this with a guy

Go on tumblr and pick anyone, the chance you get one of us is pretty big

We’re not rare, we’re just all inside on our computers.

Dude, I know girls who would do this who are hardly ever on the internet. We actually are not hard to find at all.

(Source: emmugh)

icantbelieveitsalawblog:

I’m not that big of a comics geek, but the whole “Fake Geek Girl” thing is incomprehensible to me. This comic seems to sum it up quite well.

sandetiger:

bunnywith:

the-fury-of-a-time-lord:

grantaire-put-that-bottle-down:

ihititwithmyaxe:

mothernaturenetwork:

 Harry Potter wizarding genetics decoded



If the wizarding gene is dominant, as J.K. Rowling says in her famous series of Harry Potter books, then how can a wizard be born to muggle parents (non-magical people)? And how can there be squibs (non-magical people born into wizarding lines)?
It seems these baffling genetic questions have finally been answered, thanks to Andrea Klenotiz, a biology student at the University of Delaware.
In a six-page paper, which she sent to Rowling, Klenotiz outlines how the wizarding gene works and even explains why some witches and wizards are more powerful than others.
“Magical ability could be explained by a single autosomal dominant gene if it is caused by an expansion of trinucleotide repeats with non-Mendelian ratios of inheritance,” Klenotiz explains.
What does this mean?
In school we learn the fundamentals of genetics by studying Gregory Mendel’s pea plant experiments and completing basic Punnett squares. Basically, we’re taught that whenever one copy of a gene linked to a dominant trait is present, then the offspring will exhibit that dominant trait, regardless of the other gene.
However, Non-Mendelian genes don’t follow this rule, which is the basis of Klenotiz’s argument. She says that the wizarding gene could be explained if it’s caused by a trinucleotide repeat, which is the repetition of three nucleotides — the building blocks of DNA — multiple times.
These repeats can be found in normal genes, but sometimes many more copies of this repeated code can appear in genes than is standard, causing a mutation. This kind of mutation is responsible for genetic diseases like Huntington’s Disease. Depending upon how many of these repeats occur in the genes, a person could exhibit no symptoms, could have a mild form of the disease or could have a severe form of it.
In her paper, Klenotiz argues that eggs with high levels of these repeats are more likely to be fertilized, a phenomenon known as transmission ratio distortion. She also suggests that the egg or sperm with high levels of repeats is less likely to be created or to survive in the wizarding womb.
This argument answers several questions about wizarding genetics:
How can a wizard be born to muggle parents?
Genetic mutations can randomly appear, meaning anyone could be born with the wizarding gene. However, there’s a better chance of magical offspring occurring if the parents are on the high side of the normal range for mutations.
How can a squib be born to wizard parents?
Although parents with these mutated magical genes would be likely to pass the gene on to their children, there’s still a possibility that any given offspring might not inherit the trinucleotide repeat.
How can varying degrees of magical ability be explained?
The more repeats a wizard inherits, the stronger the magical power he or she will have. If both wizarding parents are powerful wizards, it’s likely their offspring will also be powerful.
You can read Klenotiz’s full paper on wizarding genetics here.




Far and away one of the nerdiest things I’ve ever read. Love it.



 I keep thinking “there’s no way people take fandom this seriously”
and I keep being proven wrong
so gloriously wrong

Beautiful

ridiculously relevant to my interests

sandetiger:

bunnywith:

the-fury-of-a-time-lord:

grantaire-put-that-bottle-down:

ihititwithmyaxe:

mothernaturenetwork:

Harry Potter wizarding genetics decoded

If the wizarding gene is dominant, as J.K. Rowling says in her famous series of Harry Potter books, then how can a wizard be born to muggle parents (non-magical people)? And how can there be squibs (non-magical people born into wizarding lines)?

It seems these baffling genetic questions have finally been answered, thanks to Andrea Klenotiz, a biology student at the University of Delaware.

In a six-page paper, which she sent to Rowling, Klenotiz outlines how the wizarding gene works and even explains why some witches and wizards are more powerful than others.

“Magical ability could be explained by a single autosomal dominant gene if it is caused by an expansion of trinucleotide repeats with non-Mendelian ratios of inheritance,” Klenotiz explains.

What does this mean?

In school we learn the fundamentals of genetics by studying Gregory Mendel’s pea plant experiments and completing basic Punnett squares. Basically, we’re taught that whenever one copy of a gene linked to a dominant trait is present, then the offspring will exhibit that dominant trait, regardless of the other gene.

However, Non-Mendelian genes don’t follow this rule, which is the basis of Klenotiz’s argument. She says that the wizarding gene could be explained if it’s caused by a trinucleotide repeat, which is the repetition of three nucleotides — the building blocks of DNA — multiple times.

These repeats can be found in normal genes, but sometimes many more copies of this repeated code can appear in genes than is standard, causing a mutation. This kind of mutation is responsible for genetic diseases like Huntington’s Disease. Depending upon how many of these repeats occur in the genes, a person could exhibit no symptoms, could have a mild form of the disease or could have a severe form of it.

In her paper, Klenotiz argues that eggs with high levels of these repeats are more likely to be fertilized, a phenomenon known as transmission ratio distortion. She also suggests that the egg or sperm with high levels of repeats is less likely to be created or to survive in the wizarding womb.

This argument answers several questions about wizarding genetics:

How can a wizard be born to muggle parents?

Genetic mutations can randomly appear, meaning anyone could be born with the wizarding gene. However, there’s a better chance of magical offspring occurring if the parents are on the high side of the normal range for mutations.

How can a squib be born to wizard parents?

Although parents with these mutated magical genes would be likely to pass the gene on to their children, there’s still a possibility that any given offspring might not inherit the trinucleotide repeat.

How can varying degrees of magical ability be explained?

The more repeats a wizard inherits, the stronger the magical power he or she will have. If both wizarding parents are powerful wizards, it’s likely their offspring will also be powerful.

You can read Klenotiz’s full paper on wizarding genetics here.

Far and away one of the nerdiest things I’ve ever read. Love it.

image

 I keep thinking “there’s no way people take fandom this seriously”

and I keep being proven wrong

so gloriously wrong

Beautiful

ridiculously relevant to my interests

odiedragon:

bessicajach:

jiosen:

wholove:

No, the kind of thing that can get her uninvited is calling him Doctor Who, it’s THE DOCTOR.

image

^^^^

For being a “nerd” show, they sure do get a lot of “nerd” stuff wrong. 

That’s because it’s not a “nerd show”  It’s a show for supposedly normal, well-adjusted people to watch in order to laugh AT nerds, not WITH them.

(Source: kinntana)

pbnpineapples:

hatewizard:

devidementia:

smellestine:

chipperwhale:

A lot of dumb people in the world. I’ve been told these things too many times.

Now juxtaposed to this quote that kakimari had found:
“video games should not be changed dramatically just because females want to be superior. Understand your place as equals to men”

Which is what has been spewed all day to counter the women in the game industry trend on twitter that has been going around the past 24 hours or so. Andres had summed up these neckbearded comments pretty well as “Sexism won’t go away if you keep talking about it you stupid sluts!” (note, he didn’t say this he’s making a hyperbole of these young white gamer boys feeling threatened by women asking for equal treatment in the community and industry)

what you fail to realize is that video games shouldn’t cater to females in the first place. It’s largely known that it’s targeted towards the MALE demographic and has been for so many years, so why would they ask for something like that to be handed to them on a goddamn silver platter?
that’s like a guy walking into the women’s department of clothing at a sears and demanding that there be more clothing for men there. Separation of sections be damned.
that’s not how it fucking works

no not really
the game industry is more like walking into a regular department store and seeing that all the clothes are only men’s clothes
and when you ask the cashier where the women’s clothing section is, they wheel out a small rack of cheaply made tutus, g-strings, and high heels all in bright pink
and then when you go “wow really that’s it” you get called an uppity bitch and everybody assumes you want all the focus on you when in reality you’d just like to be considered a worthwhile demographic since you also like to wear clothes, it’s not like you want some ridiculous getup, you just want a solid shirt and pair of pants that fits you alright.
I mean hell you even sort of like men’s clothes and you have no problem wearing them. They suit you well. But it’s very obvious once you throw on a pair of men’s pants that they were not made for you.

men need to get over themselves. 

pbnpineapples:

hatewizard:

devidementia:

smellestine:

chipperwhale:

A lot of dumb people in the world. I’ve been told these things too many times.

Now juxtaposed to this quote that kakimari had found:

“video games should not be changed dramatically just because females want to be superior. Understand your place as equals to men”


Which is what has been spewed all day to counter the women in the game industry trend on twitter that has been going around the past 24 hours or so. Andres had summed up these neckbearded comments pretty well as “Sexism won’t go away if you keep talking about it you stupid sluts!” (note, he didn’t say this he’s making a hyperbole of these young white gamer boys feeling threatened by women asking for equal treatment in the community and industry)

what you fail to realize is that video games shouldn’t cater to females in the first place. It’s largely known that it’s targeted towards the MALE demographic and has been for so many years, so why would they ask for something like that to be handed to them on a goddamn silver platter?

that’s like a guy walking into the women’s department of clothing at a sears and demanding that there be more clothing for men there. Separation of sections be damned.

that’s not how it fucking works

no not really

the game industry is more like walking into a regular department store and seeing that all the clothes are only men’s clothes

and when you ask the cashier where the women’s clothing section is, they wheel out a small rack of cheaply made tutus, g-strings, and high heels all in bright pink

and then when you go “wow really that’s it” you get called an uppity bitch and everybody assumes you want all the focus on you when in reality you’d just like to be considered a worthwhile demographic since you also like to wear clothes, it’s not like you want some ridiculous getup, you just want a solid shirt and pair of pants that fits you alright.

I mean hell you even sort of like men’s clothes and you have no problem wearing them. They suit you well. But it’s very obvious once you throw on a pair of men’s pants that they were not made for you.

men need to get over themselves. 

Alive with the Glory of Love: The Problem With The Big Bang Theory...

liamdryden:

overtheunderpass:

butmyopinionisright:

I’ve been meaning to post something about The Big Bang Theory for a while now but it’s taken me ‘till now to really understand what it is about the show that makes me uncomfortable. I’m not exactly a believer in the whole “only write about the things you like, don’t trash the things you don’t” trend which seems to be plaguing comments sections in negative articles lately, but I wanted to be able to really examine why I don’t like TBBT rather than just slagging it off. My main questions being - Why don’t I like this anymore? Why do I feel uncomfortable watching it? And why do I get so annoyed when I see people sing its praises online? The thing which really sparked this post was seeing a raft of comments on Facebook, below the last round of voting in Television Without Pity’s Tubey Awards, claiming The Big Bang Theory to be “the best comedy on TV”. This made me angry so instead of posting an impulsive comment calling out their bad taste which I’d probably regret later, I decided to really analyse why seeing comments like that made me so mad when previously, although I didn’t really love the show, I’d never considered myself as disliking The Big Bang Theory.

Hell, I even have season one on dvd, it’s sitting right between Battlestar Galactica and Bored To Death in my alphabetised collection.

And here, I think, is where my problem with The Big Bang Theory lies…

Read More

This is very well said and I agree with this a lot (especially the bit where Community is used as a comparison).

Wow! A really good post that encapsulates my thoughts about TBBT much better than just “nerd humour made accessible for the kind of people who find Two and a Half Men funny”

edwardspoonhands:

kanderpants:

OH MY GOD. 


Yup….that’s how it happened. 

So now we must explain to the Outsiders that we don’t fight nerds, but rather for them.

edwardspoonhands:

kanderpants:

OH MY GOD. 


Yup….that’s how it happened. 

So now we must explain to the Outsiders that we don’t fight nerds, but rather for them.

(Source: kanderpants)

meido:

I hate when people mention nerds and say “I have a life,” as if to suggest that they are better than them. I’ve gotten it a lot, a girl recently messaged me on Facebook mentioning she wasn’t online all the time for this “reason”. I really don’t understand. Does going to parties so often mean that your life is more meaningful than mine? Your standard of living simply may not be mine. Going out and being very social may be what makes you happy, but have you considered that not everyone is that way? I’ve been called a pathetic no-life nerd countless times, in many manners, even by myself in the past, but really, I’m doing what makes me happy. I have the best friends in the world, but other people aren’t what define my life. What makes me happy is. Even if everyone laughs at me, whatever people say, I shouldn’t care. I’m just not a social person. I take comfort in solitude, and though I do need company and love, I don’t necessarily want it every day. I’m happy immersing myself in a book and filling my mind with adventure. I have other goals, too, but my life is not worth less than yours because my standards are different.

(Source: exmeido)

vondell-swain:

bradofarrell:

vondell-swain:

bradofarrell:

vondell-swain:

venusaurphobia:

cataquack:

“it appears to be a lord of the rings ring”

spoken like a true nerd lolz 

a scene from a show about nerds being nerdy where they talk about their nerdiness even though they clearly aren’t actually nerds I feel like this is offensive in some way

a lord of the rings ring

I know when I hang out with my nerdy friends we all sit around saying very famous quotes from very famous movies and then taking a moment to say “we are SUCH nerds.”

“interesting! it seems to be a Star Wars laser sword!” “Use the force, Luke!” “Chewbacca!” “Hahahaha, we are SO nerdy!” “I know, I’ve seen that movie like FOUR times!”

“Interesting! It seems to be a Batman car.”

“Hahah! It’s a Mario turtle!”

(Source: penasexual)